

Article content
A week ago, in a spirited, resolute and bombastic press conference, Prime Minister Mark Carney framed the tariff war with the U.S. as nothing less than the survival of Canada.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
or
Article content
Carney was determined to “protect Canadian sovereignty,” maintain our “independence and sovereignty,” and “not compromise our sovereignty.”
Article content
Article content
“The new U.S. tariffs are designed to hurt us and divide us,” he said.
Article content
Article content
But a week later the prime minister’s belligerent rhetoric is looking increasingly like political theatre. And it is a show where the script has been shared with his ministers.
Article content
By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
“We cannot accept what they have offered and we will not give what they have asked,” said Carney on that Saturday.
Article content
By Monday, ministers were on board.
Article content
“They asked too much of Canada and offered too little in return,” said Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne.
Article content
“We will not accept a bad deal which asks too much of Canada and offers too little in return,” said Industry Minister Mélanie Joly.
Article content
It is unfortunate that the Liberal government is still refusing to reveal exactly what the U.S. was asking and why Canada felt unable to accept.
Article content
What we do know is that of the three examples that Carney cited on that Saturday as being a threat to our sovereignty one has been settled, and may never have been an issue, and we largely appear to agree on a second.
Article content
The third issue, tariff levels on medium and heavy-duty trucks is an outstanding irritant and a large one. The potential economic harm to Ontario especially is such that it is likely to have always been a red line for Canada.
Article content
Article content
But tariffs on trucks isn’t a sovereignty issue, it’s a trade one and best dealt with at the negotiating table.
Article content
Article content
Carney told Canadians, “We are masters of our destiny.” Fine, but we are not masters of the U.S. and if they want to impose tariffs, it may be unreasonable, unfair, uneconomic and ultimately disastrous, but that’s what a sovereign nation can do.
Article content
However, framing tariffs on trucks as an existential threat to Canada was never going to be enough for Liberals. Arguing over 25 per cent tariffs on medium and heavy trucks is a legitimate aim for trade negotiators but lacks the drama needed by a fiery prime minister to fire up Canada.
Article content
A week ago, a steadfast Carney warned that “American was trying to break us so they can own us and I promised that would never, never happen.”
Article content
If the backdrop to that was tariffs on trucks, then Carney might have been accused of being less Churchillian and more Shakespearean.
Article content
Hence, Carney introduced two other factors: the risk to our language and culture as well as our ability to make trade deals with other countries.
Article content
These are things to rile up the masses.